Comparison
Bio-PA610 Flexible vs Polycarbonate
A side-by-side comparison of Bio-based Polyamide 610, Flexible Grade Q and Polycarbonate.
Physical
Density
1.05-1.07 g/cm³
1.20 g/cm³
Water Absorption (24h)
0.8-1.5 %
0.15 %
Transparency
Opaque
Transparent (88% light transmission)
Shrinkage
1.0 - 2.0 %
0.5 – 0.8 %
Mechanical
Young's Modulus
1.8-2.5 GPa
2.3 – 2.4 GPa
Tensile Strength
50-65 MPa
60 – 70 MPa
Elongation at Break
25-40 %
100 – 150 %
Impact Strength (Izod)
4.0-8.0 J/cm
600 – 900 J/m
Flexural Strength
—
90 – 100 MPa
Hardness (Rockwell M)
—
70
Thermal
Glass Transition Temperature
40-50 °C
147 °C
Melting Point
210-225 °C
—
Continuous Service Temperature
90-100 °C
115 – 130 °C
Heat Deflection Temperature
50-60 °C
130 – 140 °C
Thermal Conductivity
—
0.20 W/m·K
CTE
—
65 – 70 × 10⁻⁶ /K
Electrical
Dielectric Constant
4.0
2.9 – 3.0
Volume Resistivity
10¹⁰ Ω·cm
10¹⁶ Ω·cm
Dielectric Strength
25 kV/mm
15 kV/mm
Chemical resistance
Acids
Moderate resistance
—
Bases
Good resistance
Poor
Solvents
Good resistance to oils, greases; attacked by strong acids
—
UV Resistance
Moderate (requires additive)
Poor (unless coated)
Acids (dilute)
—
Good
Alcohols
—
Fair
Oils
—
Good
Gasoline
—
Fair
Acetone
—
Poor (attacks)
Sustainability
Recyclability
Recyclable (often downcycled)
Recyclable
Recycling Code
7 (Other)
7
Carbon Footprint
Lower than conventional PA610
~5 kg CO₂e / kg
Bio-based Content
—
0 – 50 % (bio grades)