Comparison

Bio-PET Bottle Grade O vs ABS

A side-by-side comparison of Bio-based Polyethylene Terephthalate, Bottle Grade O and Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene.

Physical

Density
1.38-1.40 g/cm³
1.04 – 1.07 g/cm³
Water Absorption (24h)
0.3 %
0.20 – 0.45 %
Transparency
Excellent
Opaque
Shrinkage
1.0 - 2.0 %
0.4 – 0.9 %
Specific Gravity
1.05
Surface Finish
Matte to glossy

Mechanical

Young's Modulus
2.5-3.5 GPa
1.8 – 2.5 GPa
Tensile Strength
50-75 MPa
40 – 50 MPa
Elongation at Break
5-20 %
10 – 50 %
Impact Strength (Izod)
0.3-0.5 J/cm
200 – 400 J/m
Flexural Strength
60 – 80 MPa
Hardness (Rockwell R)
100 – 115

Thermal

Glass Transition Temperature
70-80 °C
105 °C
Melting Point
240-260 °C
Amorphous (no true Tm)
Continuous Service Temperature
70 °C
70 – 90 °C
Heat Deflection Temperature
65 °C
85 – 100 °C
Thermal Conductivity
0.17 W/m·K
CTE
80 – 100 × 10⁻⁶ /K

Electrical

Dielectric Constant
3.0-3.3
2.7 – 3.2
Volume Resistivity
10¹⁴ Ω·cm
10¹⁶ Ω·cm
Dielectric Strength
20 kV/mm
15 – 20 kV/mm
Surface Resistivity
10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical resistance

Acids
Good resistance
Bases
Poor resistance
Good
Solvents
Resistant to oils and greases, but can be attacked by strong bases and chlorinated solvents
UV Resistance
Moderate
Poor (unless stabilized)
Acids (dilute)
Good
Alcohols
Good
Oils & Greases
Fair
Gasoline
Poor
Acetone
Attacks / dissolves
Weathering
Poor without stabilizers

Sustainability

Recyclability
Recyclable (same as fossil-based PET)
Recyclable (mechanical)
Recycling Code
1 (PET)
7 (Other)
Carbon Footprint
Reduced compared to virgin fossil-based PET
~3.1 kg CO₂e / kg
Bio-based Content
0 %