Comparison

CPVC Hot Water Pipe vs ABS

A side-by-side comparison of Chlorinated Polyvinyl Chloride for Hot Water Piping and Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene.

Property

CPVC Hot Water Pipe

ABS

Physical

Density

1.50-1.65 g/cm³

1.04 – 1.07 g/cm³

Water Absorption (24h)

0.1-0.5 %

0.20 – 0.45 %

Transparency

Opaque

Shrinkage

0.5-1.5 %

0.4 – 0.9 %

Specific Gravity

—

1.05

Surface Finish

—

Matte to glossy

Mechanical

Young's Modulus

2.0-3.5 GPa

1.8 – 2.5 GPa

Tensile Strength

45-55 MPa

40 – 50 MPa

Elongation at Break

15-30 %

10 – 50 %

Impact Strength (Izod)

20-40 J/m

200 – 400 J/m

Flexural Strength

—

60 – 80 MPa

Hardness (Rockwell R)

—

100 – 115

Thermal

Glass Transition Temperature

90-110 °C

105 °C

Melting Point

N/A (degrades)

Amorphous (no true Tm)

Continuous Service Temperature

70-90 °C

70 – 90 °C

Heat Deflection Temperature

80-100 °C

85 – 100 °C

Thermal Conductivity

—

0.17 W/m·K

CTE

—

80 – 100 × 10⁻⁶ /K

Electrical

Dielectric Constant

3.5-4.0

2.7 – 3.2

Volume Resistivity

10¹⁰-10¹² Ω⋅cm

10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Dielectric Strength

15-25 kV/mm

15 – 20 kV/mm

Surface Resistivity

—

10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical resistance

Acids

Excellent resistance

—

Bases

Excellent resistance

Good

Solvents

Attacked by ketones, esters, chlorinated and aromatic hydrocarbons

—

UV Resistance

Poor (requires stabilization)

Poor (unless stabilized)

Acids (dilute)

—

Good

Alcohols

—

Good

Oils & Greases

—

Fair

Gasoline

—

Poor

Acetone

—

Attacks / dissolves

Weathering

—

Poor without stabilizers

Sustainability

Recyclability

Recyclable (challenging)

Recyclable (mechanical)

Recycling Code

3 (PVC)

7 (Other)

Carbon Footprint

Moderate to High

~3.1 kg CO₂e / kg

Bio-based Content

—

0 %