Comparison

PP Homopolymer Injection vs Polycarbonate

A side-by-side comparison of Polypropylene Homopolymer for Injection Molding and Polycarbonate.

Physical

Density
0.900-0.915 g/cm³
1.20 g/cm³
Water Absorption (24h)
<0.05 %
0.15 %
Transparency
Can be translucent to opaque
Transparent (88% light transmission)
Shrinkage
1-2.5 %
0.5 – 0.8 %

Mechanical

Young's Modulus
1.2-1.7 GPa
2.3 – 2.4 GPa
Tensile Strength
30-40 MPa
60 – 70 MPa
Elongation at Break
2-10 %
100 – 150 %
Impact Strength (Izod)
50-100 J/m
600 – 900 J/m
Flexural Strength
90 – 100 MPa
Hardness (Rockwell M)
70

Thermal

Glass Transition Temperature
-10 °C
147 °C
Melting Point
160-170 °C
Continuous Service Temperature
80-100 °C
115 – 130 °C
Heat Deflection Temperature
60-80 °C
130 – 140 °C
Thermal Conductivity
0.20 W/m·K
CTE
65 – 70 × 10⁻⁶ /K

Electrical

Dielectric Constant
2.2-2.3
2.9 – 3.0
Volume Resistivity
>10¹⁶ Ω⋅cm
10¹⁶ Ω·cm
Dielectric Strength
20-30 kV/mm
15 kV/mm

Chemical resistance

Acids
Excellent resistance
Bases
Excellent resistance
Poor
Solvents
Good resistance at room temperature, swells in hot aromatic and chlorinated hydrocarbons
UV Resistance
Poor (requires stabilization)
Poor (unless coated)
Acids (dilute)
Good
Alcohols
Fair
Oils
Good
Gasoline
Fair
Acetone
Poor (attacks)

Sustainability

Recyclability
Recyclable
Recyclable
Recycling Code
5 (PP)
7
Carbon Footprint
Moderate
~5 kg CO₂e / kg
Bio-based Content
0 – 50 % (bio grades)