Comparison
rPP Copo PIR Filled vs PEEK
A side-by-side comparison of Recycled Polypropylene Copolymer Post-Industrial Recycled Filled and Polyether Ether Ketone.
Physical
Density
0.900-0.920 g/cm³
1.32 g/cm³
Water Absorption (24h)
0.02-0.05 %
0.15 %
Transparency
Opaque
Opaque (amber)
Shrinkage
1.0-2.5 % (depending on filler)
1.1 – 1.4 %
Mechanical
Young's Modulus
1.5-3.0 GPa (with filler)
3.6 GPa
Tensile Strength
25-40 MPa
100 MPa
Elongation at Break
5-50 % (depending on filler)
50 %
Impact Strength (Izod)
40-80 J/m (with filler)
55 J/m
Flexural Strength
—
170 MPa
Thermal
Glass Transition Temperature
-5 °C
143 °C
Melting Point
150-165 °C
343 °C
Continuous Service Temperature
80-95 °C
260 °C
Heat Deflection Temperature
70-90 °C (0.45 MPa, with filler)
160 °C
Electrical
Dielectric Constant
2.2-2.5
3.2
Volume Resistivity
>10^16 Ohm·cm
10¹⁶ Ω·cm
Dielectric Strength
18-28 kV/mm
—
Chemical resistance
Acids
Good
Excellent
Bases
Good
Excellent
Solvents
Good resistance to many organic solvents
Excellent
UV Resistance
Poor (requires UV stabilizers)
Fair
Hydrolysis (steam)
—
Excellent
Sustainability
Recyclability
Recyclable
Recyclable (specialty)
Recycling Code
5 (PP)
7
Carbon Footprint
Lower than virgin PP copolymer
~30 kg CO₂e / kg