Comparison
rPP Copo PIR Natural Impact vs PETG
A side-by-side comparison of Recycled Polypropylene Copolymer Post-Industrial Recycled Natural Impact and Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol.
Physical
Density
0.900-0.915 g/cm³
1.27 g/cm³
Water Absorption (24h)
0.02-0.05 %
0.13 %
Transparency
Opaque
Transparent
Shrinkage
1.5-2.5 %
0.2 – 0.5 %
Mechanical
Young's Modulus
1.0-1.4 GPa
2.1 GPa
Tensile Strength
25-40 MPa
50 MPa
Elongation at Break
10-50 %
120 %
Impact Strength (Izod)
40-80 J/m
100 J/m
Flexural Strength
—
70 MPa
Thermal
Glass Transition Temperature
-5 °C
80 °C
Melting Point
150-165 °C
—
Continuous Service Temperature
80-95 °C
65 °C
Heat Deflection Temperature
60-75 °C (0.45 MPa)
70 °C
CTE
—
68 × 10⁻⁶ /K
Electrical
Dielectric Constant
2.2-2.5
3.3
Volume Resistivity
>10^16 Ohm·cm
10¹⁴ Ω·cm
Dielectric Strength
18-28 kV/mm
—
Chemical resistance
Acids
Good
Good
Bases
Good
Fair
Solvents
Good resistance to many organic solvents
—
UV Resistance
Poor (requires UV stabilizers)
Fair
Alcohols
—
Good
Oils
—
Good
Sustainability
Recyclability
Recyclable
Recyclable
Recycling Code
5 (PP)
1
Carbon Footprint
Lower than virgin PP copolymer
~2.7 kg CO₂e / kg
Bio-based Content
—
0 %