Comparison
Regenerated Cellulose Transparent M vs Polycarbonate
A side-by-side comparison of Regenerated Cellulose, Transparent Grade M and Polycarbonate.
Physical
Density
1.45 g/cm³
1.20 g/cm³
Water Absorption (24h)
10.0 %
0.15 %
Transparency
Exceptional
Transparent (88% light transmission)
Shrinkage
5.0 - 10.0 %
0.5 – 0.8 %
Mechanical
Young's Modulus
10 GPa
2.3 – 2.4 GPa
Tensile Strength
100 MPa
60 – 70 MPa
Elongation at Break
2.0 %
100 – 150 %
Impact Strength (Izod)
0.05 J/cm
600 – 900 J/m
Flexural Strength
—
90 – 100 MPa
Hardness (Rockwell M)
—
70
Thermal
Glass Transition Temperature
100-150 °C
147 °C
Melting Point
None (decomposes)
—
Continuous Service Temperature
60 °C
115 – 130 °C
Heat Deflection Temperature
60 °C
130 – 140 °C
Thermal Conductivity
—
0.20 W/m·K
CTE
—
65 – 70 × 10⁻⁶ /K
Electrical
Dielectric Constant
6.0
2.9 – 3.0
Volume Resistivity
10¹⁰ Ω·cm
10¹⁶ Ω·cm
Dielectric Strength
20 kV/mm
15 kV/mm
Chemical resistance
Acids
Good resistance
—
Bases
Good resistance
Poor
Solvents
Insoluble in common organic solvents, but sensitive to moisture
—
UV Resistance
Moderate
Poor (unless coated)
Acids (dilute)
—
Good
Alcohols
—
Fair
Oils
—
Good
Gasoline
—
Fair
Acetone
—
Poor (attacks)
Sustainability
Recyclability
Biodegradable (compost)
Recyclable
Recycling Code
7 (Other)
7
Carbon Footprint
Moderate
~5 kg CO₂e / kg
Bio-based Content
—
0 – 50 % (bio grades)